Barelds, D. P. H., & Barelds-Dijkstra, P. (2007). Ties certainly partner identity feature similarity, dating onset, matchmaking high quality, and you may love. [ Hyperlinks ]
Baxter, L. A., & West, L. (2003). Couples attitudes of their similarities and you will differences: A great dialectical perspective. Journal regarding Private and you will Personal Dating, 20, 491-514. [ Links ]
Berscheid, E. (1985)patibility, interdependence, and you will emotion. During the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you may incompatible dating (pp. 143-161). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]
Berscheid, Elizabeth., Dion, K., Walster, Age., & Walster, G. W. (1971). Physical appeal and relationship selection: An examination of your complimentary theory. Record of Fresh Social Psychology, seven, 173-189. [ Hyperlinks ]
Record away from Societal and personal Relationships, 24, 479-496
Berscheid, Elizabeth., & Regan, P. (2005). The fresh psychology regarding interpersonal relationship. Upper Saddle Lake, NJ: Pearson Training (Prentice Hall). [ Backlinks ]
Berger, C. Roentgen. (1975). Activity results and attributional communications because determinants out-of interpersonal attraction. Address Monographs, 40, 280-286. [ Backlinks ]
Berscheid, Age., & Reis, H. T. (1998). Destination and you will personal matchmaking. Within the D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & Grams. Lindzey (Eds.), The brand new handbook off public psychology (Vol. 2, next ed. Pp. 193-281). Ny: McGraw-Slope. [ Website links ]
Buckwalter, J. Grams., Carter, S. R., Forgatch, Grams. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, Letter. C. (2004, Can get eleven). You.S. Patent six,735,568. Arizona, DC. [ Hyperlinks ]
Buckwalter, J. Grams., Carter, S. R., Forgatch, G. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, Letter. C. (2008, Late. 18). You.S. Patent 7,454,357B2. Arizona, DC. [ Backlinks ]
Buss, D. Meters. (1984). Marital variety to possess personality dispositions: Investigations that have about three more investigation supply. Conclusion Family genes, 14, 111-123. [ Links ]
Byrne, D., & Rhamey, R. (1965). Magnitude of negative and positive reinforcements just like the good determinant of interest. Record from Personality and you may Public Psychology, dos, 884-889. [ Backlinks ]
Carter, S. R. (2005, Feb.), To have modern-big date Cupids, study substitute relationship: Mental research is behind the newest winning matches produced within eHarmony. Association getting Emotional Science Observer, 18. Downloaded from [ Website links ]
Carter, S. R., & Buckwalter, J. G. (2009). Increasing companion choices over the internet: A comparison out-of matchmaking quality anywhere between marriage ceremonies due to an online dating system and you may marriage ceremonies due to unfettered choice. Interpersona: A major international Log to your Private Relationships, 3, 105-125. [ Website links ]
Carter, S., & Snowfall, C. (2004, May). Helping american singles go into best marriage ceremonies having fun with predictive types of relationship profits. Papers displayed on 16th Yearly Conference of your Western Psychological People. [ Backlinks ]
Means and program to own identifying individuals who are attending has actually a fruitful relationship
C). How does personality amount inside ination out-of feature nervousness, negativity, and marital fulfillment. Record of Personality and you will Social Therapy, 78, 326-336. [ Website links ]
Clark, Yards Orchid Romance gratis app. S. (1985). Effects regarding relationship kind of to have expertise compatibility. When you look at the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and in conflict matchmaking (pp. 119-140). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Website links ]
Coombs, R. H., & Kenkel, W. F. (1966). Sex variations in matchmaking ambition and you can pleasure having computer system-arranged couples. Journal away from ily, twenty eight, 62-66. [ Links ]
Cooper, A good., & Sportolari, L. (1997). Love on the net: Facts online destination. Diary from Sex Training and Medication, twenty-two, 7-14. [ Links ]
Dijkstra, P., & Barelds, D. P. H. (2008). Manage anyone understand what they need: An equivalent or complementary partner? Evolutionary Mindset, six, 595-602. [ Backlinks ]
Feingold, A great. (1988). Complimentary to possess elegance inside romantic people and you can same-sex nearest and dearest: An excellent meta-research and you may theoretic complaints. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 226-235. [ Links ]
Felmlee, D. H. (2001). Away from attractive to terrible: Disenchantment with an intimate lover. Sociological Point of views, 44, 263-280. [ Backlinks ]